Via PayPal:
Please send € 26,00 (Euro) to this paypal address: [wcologarb at tlen.pl] writing "ob-6 sounds" + your email in the title / note. I will send the soundset after I get notified about your payment (max 24 hours).

Via Debit / Credit Card:
Send me an email letting me know you'd like to have your card charged - I will send you a payment request and it will be processed by my Paypal (you don't have to own a Paypal account, your card is enough - here's a fuller explanation).

How many patches?:
You will receive all the sounds from my Youtube videos plus extra sounds that are not included in the demos (125 presets + their variations = 139 presets in total).

What format / import method?:
My library will come to you in two formats: sysex format and OB-6 Sound Tower editor format.

Any external processing?:
I did not use any external FX in the demo, no layers, etc. All the delays and reverbs are part of the OB-6 engine.

Notes on grades lower than 3/3:

BUILD QUALITY

There's not much to say, because just like the products of its countrymen from Moog, this Sequential synth is a top quality instrument with even less shortcomings - if any! It's great that Dave Smith decided to use a "no force necessary" type of buttons, and guys at Moog have yet to figure out this is the only right way to go. There is not one thing in the OB-6 that seems likely to break or at least malfunction (provided, of course, that you protect it from dust). Perfect resistance of knobs, nice keyboard, not too heavy, not too light.

UI

It's pretty obvious for everyone that has eyes, but it needs to be mentioned: the interface should win an award. It's a classic design and an instant-gratification synth. I know, I know - there are numbers instead of patch names, no possibility to edit the sequence without relying on software, etc. But let's be honest. If you can afford this kind of synth, you probably are so successful that you have no time to play it, let alone dive deep into the sequences or come up with fancy patch names. So why care about these quirks? You don't experience them anyway. Joke.

THE SOUND

When I got the OB-6, I asked my friend why this synth sits on the bestseller list while it costs so much. I mean, there's the Deepminds and the Odyssey clones and the Microfreaks and the OB-6 among them looks like a macaw in a field of cabbage. "It's the sound", he said, "people pay for the Oberheim sound". Although I have to admit that at the beginning the OB-6 sounded thin & glossy & metallic, and the limited modulation options seemed illogical and surprising for me. I went to Youtube but all the videos only confirmed my first impressions: it costs $3000 and sounds like crap! Holy cow! Call the police! But very soon I've managed to "get" this sound (or my sound), and some patches managed to enter the league of "the unbeatable"  (LP/BP filter morphs, x-moded basses, synthetic brass-like tones, etc). Also, the envelopes are so snappy and punchy that I would swear the sounds are running thru a compressor if I hadn't made them myself.

Let's get back for a short moment to the fact that the modulation possibilities of the synth are in some aspects severely limited. Even though it's true, this is only a piece of the picture. Let me throw in the Prophet REV-2 for comparison. The REV-2 has much more modulation options, but the core sound is "stiffer". The effects of such modulations may fall short of your imagined or anticipated results. OB-6, on the other hand, has a more "cooperative" sound from the get-go, so it's easier to modulate it into something convincing or appealing. Also, I think I'd rather have a synth with a limited modulation routings but one that has cross-modulation (called "X-Mod" on the OB-6), than a synth with a deep mod matrix, yet missing (for whatever reason) the cross-mod, which I find to be a very usable tool for sound design.

So when you finish having your usual fun with your OB-6, don't forget to tamper with the Detune knob, the Pan Sprad knob to give the sound that extra space / spaciousness, and most importantly the X-Mod VCO2 knob, which will introduce some unpredictability / wonkiness. Just remember that the OB-6 is a little bit wonky in itself, so if you add bonus detuning to that, the X-Mod section will create a challenge. Because if the VCO2 pitch changes each time you hit a note, the modulations "inflicted" by this VCO will vary, so sometimes it's impossible to have consistency (for example when you mod a pitch destination and pitch stability is needed).

Also, don't underestimate the FX section. On paper it looks pretty standard: delay, reverb, chorus, flanger, phaser. But the fact that you can combine 3 of them at the same time (any 2 of the above + hidden distortion) let's you double the sonic palette of the OB-6. And they are very good, because, one: they sound good, and two: because they can go to solid extremes and mangle the timbre noticeably. This transforms the FX unit into another sound sculpting module, which can't be said about the FX design of other synths, say, Korg Minilogue XD, whose FX section is rather a decorative element.

I can't for the love of Christ understand this "advice" I'm seeing for almost every synth out there which says "DO NOT USE THE INTERNAL FX BECAUSE IT KILLS THE BEAUTIFUL ANALOG SOUND". Geez. Am I deaf, or should I devote more of my limited time on this Earth to think about such nuances and then enlightenment would come? I wish all effects on synths were that bad. If the OB-6 effects are bad, then the REV-2 effects must be called nothing else but an abomination.

One more thing: pay attention to the ring modulator too: in its non-usual mode, it tracks the pitch of the lowest note that you play on the keyboard. Combine it with the seqeuncer and you can go pretty mental.

THE END

I don't know why that is, but the only DSI / Sequential synth that seemed "100% right" to me was the Evolver. I played the Prophet X, the REV-2 and I asked about the Prophet 12. Those synths are unable to launch the LFO and fill its phase independently of key strikes (note on/off). Here, the OB-6 cannot properly latch the Arpeggiator (I don't think there even is a button for that). So in the aforementioned synths it's impossible to keep consistent LFO modulation across the sequence; it sounds different with each key strike (or restarts in an ugly way with each key strike). And since I am a human and not a robot with quantized movements, in OB-6 the lack of Arp Latch option makes the Arpeggiator pretty useless for me, and it's better if I program an arpeggio pattern into the sequencer, but of course that has its drawbacks (I'm a slave to the rhythm, to quote a classic).

Generally speaking, the OB-6 reminds me heavily of the Nord Leads. One: it sounds as if it was already mastered in a studio. Two: the sound is kind of "thin" but lucid, so that's the good kind of thin (it never gets muddy or stiff). Three: the interface is hands-on, you get what you see, no menu diving, etc. Four: the build quality is top of the tops (actually much better / more sturdy than Nord Leads). Five: made in the country of design (USA for OB-6, Sweden for NL). Of course in the end the OB-6 is much more than the Nord Lead thanks to its FX, filter morphing and modulation routings. But the first three characteristics alone ("pro" sound, clarity, UI) are a recipe for success among the synth crowd that rarely fails.

I'm not a nerd with an oscilloscope and I don't spend 4 hours each day splitting hairs on a forum, so I'm not sure, but probably the OB-6 uses some analog components that have their significant cost (and which make it sound much better than the aforementioned Nord Leads). Still, I think the OB-6 sounds too sterile / tame / hi-fi compared to "real" analogs, so I'm in two minds about it. I would have to think hard whether I want to shell out the €3000 on the OB-6 and have my peace of mind, or buy a dirty-sounding vintage analog and worry that it dies too soon.

Support this page when you buy gear:
[full story]